Indie or Mainstream? Tensions and Nuances between the Alternative and the Mainstream in Indie Games
The commercial emergence of “indie games” since 2008 represents a fundamental challenge for contemporary game studies. As we still do not have a clear definition of the indie game, its popularity and commercial success have made the conceptualization of this type of game even more complex. Far from being a pure videogame model, completely separated from the mainstream sphere, indie games often involve hybridizations and ambiguities between the alternative and the mainstream.
Thus this article aims to problematize the neat conceptualizations of indie games as an opposing “genre” to mainstream games by exploring the many tensions and nuances between the alternative and mainstream dimensions that can be identified within indie game production, culture and design.
The first part of the article focuses on the production and distribution issues, as well as on the cultural construction and artistic legitimation of indie games. The article then posits a design-centered analytical approach to indie games inspired by Kellner (1995) and based on “procedural rhetorics” (Bogost, 2006; Flanagan and Nissenbaum, 2014). This approach is used to look at commercially successful indie games, which we consider to be an especially suitable object of study for exploring and understanding contemporary culture through the frictions between hegemonic culture and counter-culture, progressivism and conservatism, capitalism and anti-capitalism, as well as the way we conceive these notions.
Keywordsindie game, design, culture, ideology, mainstream
ADAMS, E. (2010). Fundamentals of game design. Berkeley: New Riders.
ANTHROPY, A. (2012). Rise of the Videogame Zinesters. New York: Seven Stories.
BOGOST, I. [et al.] (2005). “Asking what is possible: The Georgia-Tech approach to Game Research and Education”. International Digital Media & Arts Association Journal. Vol. 2, issue 1, p. 59-68.
BOGOST, I. (2006). Persuasive Games. Cambridge: MIT Press.
BOURDIEU, P. (1988). La distinción: criterios y bases sociales del gusto. Madrid: Taurus.
CASSAR, R. (2013). “Gramsci and Games”. Games & Culture. Vol. 8, issue 5, p. 330-353. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1555412013493499>
DE JONG, J. (2013). Indie issues: The meaning of ‘Indie’ games and their incorporation into the ‘Mainstream’ game industry [on-line]. Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam. [Accessed: 19/11/15].
DONOVAN, T. (2010). Replay. The history of videogames. Lewes: Yellow Ant.
FLANAGAN, M.; NISSENBAUM, H. (2014). Values at Play in Digital Games. Cambridge: MIT Press.
FRASCA, G. (2007). Play the Message. Play, game and videogame rhetoric [on-line]. Doctoral Thesis, IT University of Copenhagen. [Accessed: 19/11/15]. <http://www.powerfulrobot.com/Frasca_Play_the_Message_PhD.pdf>
JAHN-SUDMANN, A. (2008). “Innovation NOT Opposition. The Logic of Distinction of Independent Games” [online]. Eludamos. Vol. 2, issue 1, p. 5-10. [Accessed: 19/11/15].
JUUL, J. (2010). A casual revolution. Reinventing videogames and their players. Cambridge: MIT Press.
KELLNER, D. (1995). Media Culture: Cultural Studies, Identity and Politics Between the Modern and the Postmodern. London: Routledge. <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203205808>
KING, G. (2009). Indiewood, USA: where Hollywood meets independent cinema. London: Tauris.
LIPKIN, N. (2013). “Examining indie’s independence: the meaning of “indie” games, the politics of production, and mainstream co-optation” [online]. Loading… Vol. 7, issue 11, p. 8-24. [Accessed: 19/11/15]. <http://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/122>
MARTIN, C.B.; DEUZE, M. (2009). “The Independent Production of Culture: A Digital Games Case Study”. Games and Culture. Vol. 4, issue 3, p. 276-295. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1555412009339732>
NEALEN, A. [et al.] (2011). “Towards minimalist game design” [online]. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games. [Accessed: 19/11/15]. <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2159371>
PARKER, F. (2013). “An Art World for ArtGames” [online]. Loading… Vol. 7, issue 11, p. 41-60. [Accessed: 19/11/15]. <http://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/119>
ROSE, N. (1998). Inventing our selves. Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ROSE, N. (1999). Governing the soul. The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.
RUFFINO, P. (2013). “Narratives of independent production in video game culture” [online]. Loading… Vol. 7, issue 11, p. 106-121. [Accessed: 19/11/15]. <http://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/120>
SALEN, K.; ZIMMERMAN, E. (2004). Rules of Play. Game design fundamentals. Cambridge: MIT Press.
SICART, M. (2008). “Defining game mechanics” [online]. Game Studies. Vol. 8, issue 2. [Accessed: 19/11/15].
SIMON, B. (2013). “Indie, eh? Some kind of game studies” [online]. Loading… Vol. 7, issue 11, p. 1-7. [Accessed: 19/11/15].
WESTECOTT, E. (2013). “Indie game development as craft” [online]. Loading… Vol. 7, issue 11, p. 78-91. [Accessed: 19/11/15]. <http://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/124>.