The Crisis in the Humanities and its Relevance to Communication Studies

Brett Ingram, Lisa Cuklanz

Abstract

Contemporary pressures on institutions of higher learning, including economic pressures, a highly competitive “rankings” environment and critiques of the high cost of a university education, are making it increasingly more difficult to maintain a focus on intellectual values traditionally held by liberal arts colleges and universities. The field of Communication has some apparent advantages in the more market-driven higher education environment, with its potential focus on skills training and practical pre-professional education. However, we argue that these very elements mean, ironically, that the field should re-focus on what can contribute to the liberal arts traditions to which it belongs. To do otherwise, and to focus on skills while other disciplines do not do so, is to sell ourselves short and to play into criticisms of the Communication Studies as one lacking in depth, rigor, and intellectual challenge. In the end, the value of the degree is undercut if practical principles are accepted above intellectual values and goals. The article argues that the Communication departments situated in schools of liberal arts, arts and sciences, or humanistic studies must eschew emphasis on skills-based course work and refocus attention on our intellectual traditions.

Keywords

communication; skills; liberal arts; technology; crisis; humanities

Full Text:

PDF EPUB

References

Association of American Colleges & Universities

BURKE, K. (1984). Permanence and Change. Print. Berkeley: University of California Press.

COHAN, P. (2012). “To Boost Post-College Prospects, Cut Humanities Departments.” Forbes. [online] [Accessed: 07/07/2015].

CORNWALL, G. H.; STODDARD, E.W. (2001). "The Future of Liberal Education and the Hegemony of Market Values: Privilege, Practicality, and Citizenship." Liberal Education. Vol. 87, no. 3.

CROSTHWAITE, p. (2011). Criticism, Crisis, and Contemporary Narrative: Textual Horizons in an Age of Global Risk. Print. New York: Routledge.

DERESIEWICZ, W. (2015). “The Neoliberal Arts: How College Sold its Soul to the Market”. Harper’s Monthly. September 2015, pp. 25-32.

EVERETT, D. (2011). “The Broccoli of Higher Ed”. Inside Higher Ed. [online] [Accessed: 14/07/2015].

FISH, S. (2010). “The Crisis of the Humanities Officially Arrives”. New York Times. [online] [Accessed: 14/07/2015].

GALLAGHER, B. (2013). “The 10 Most Worthless College Majors.” Complex. [online] [Accessed: 14/07/2015].

GOLDBERG, M. (2015). “This Professor Was Fired for Saying ‘Fuck No’ in Class”. The Nation. [online] [Accessed: 14/07/2015].

HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. (2013). “It Takes More Than a Major: Employer Priorities for College Learning and Student Success”. Liberal Education. Vol 99, p. 2. [online] [Accessed: 14/07/2015].

JAY, P.; GRAFF. G. (2012). “Fear of Being Useful”. Inside Higher Ed. [online] [Accessed: 14/07/2015].

KINKADE, T. (2013). "Pat McCrory Lashes Out Against 'Educational Elite' and Liberal Arts College Courses." Huffpost College.

KIPNIS, L. (2015). “My Title IX Inquisition.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. [online] [Accessed: 13/07/2015].

MILLER, T. (2012). Blow Up the Humanities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

NUSSBAUM, M. (2010). Not For Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

RIFKIN, B. (2012), "A Wayward Plan in Wisconsin." Inside Higher Ed.

SCHMITT, J. (2014). “Communication Studies Rise to Relevance.” Huffington Post. [online] [Accessed: 13/07/2015].

VEBLEN, T. (1957). The Higher Learning in America. Print. New York: Sagamore Press.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Copyright (c) 2016