Historical evolution of public relations psychology in Europe and the United States
Abstract
The study provides a chronological review of public relations (PR) analysed from the perspective of psychology, highlighting milestones, concepts, theories and models. It offers a synthesis of its origins in Europe and how it was imported to the United States, where it was strongly implemented at the academic, political and business levels. The foundations of the emergence and development of PR have psychology as a fundamental pillar (Bernays, 1928) in understanding the propagandistic effects on people’s social behaviour. Therefore, it seems that it would be practically impossible to understand and apply this construct throughout history without this joint interdisciplinary work, both in explaining individual and collective response and in diachronically changing behaviour in organizations (Grunig, 1976). An in-depth exploration is carried out of the international manuscripts published to date which highlight the interactions of PR with psychology in terms of public behaviour, leadership and behaviour within organizations. The results bring to light an international perspective of basic contributions and some historic gaps along the way. The identification of several key events from the past helps to understand better the general conceptual framework that connects PR and psychology. The research reveals that there is still a gap regarding the existence of a general theory to explain the history of PR psychology. Nevertheless, from a PR perspective, its psychological influence on the behaviours of the population and the persuasion of stakeholders seems indisputable.
Keywords
stakeholder, influence, persuasion, history, powerReferences
ALLPORT, G. W. (1935). “Attitudes”. In: A Handbook of Social Psychology. Worcester, MA, US: Clark University Press, 798-844.
ALLPORT, F. and NEWCOMB, T. (1954). “The structuring of events: outline of a general theory with applications to psychology”. Psychological Review, 61 (5), 281-303. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062678
ALMANSA, A. (2003). Teoría, estructura y funcionamiento de los gabinetes de comunicación. Málaga: Universidad de Málaga.
BELL, S. and BELL, E. (1976). “Public relations: Functional or functionary?”. Public Relations Review, 2 (2), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(76)80004-5
BERGER, B. K. and REBER, B. H. (2005). Gaining influence in public relations: The role of resistance in practice. New York: Routledge.
BERNAYS, E. (1928). “Manipulating Public Opinion: The Why and The How”. American Journal of Sociology, 33 (6), 958-971. https://doi.org/10.1086/214599
BROOM, G. M., CASEY, S. and RITCHEY, J. (1997). “Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships”. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9 (2), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0902_01
BERJILLOS, A., JIMÉNEZ, M. T., VALENCIA, P. T. and PERALBO, A. C. (2009). “Stakeholders, intangibles y generación de valor en las empresas del IBEX-35: Una estimación mediante modelos de panel”. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 38 (142), 239-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2009.10779668
CANCEL, A., CAMERON, G., SALLOT, L. and MITROOK, M. (1997). “It Depends: A Contingency Theory of Accommodation in Public Relations”. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9 (1), 31-63. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0901_02
CARROLL, A. B. (1989). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati: South-Western.
CAPRIOTTI, P. (2013). Planificación estratégica de la imagen corporativa (4th ed.). Málaga: Instituto de Investigación en Relaciones Públicas.
CASTILLO, A. (2009). Relaciones públicas. Teoría e historia. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
CASTILLO, A. and XIFRA TRIADÚ, J. (2006). “Investigación bibliométrica de las tesis doctorales españolas sobre las relaciones públicas”. Anàlisi: Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura, 34, 141-161.
CHEN, S. and CHAIKEN, S. (1999). “The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context”. In: S. CHAIKEN and Y. TROPE (Eds.). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: The Guilford Press, 73-96.
CIALDINI, R. (2007). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (EPub edition). New York: Harper Collins.
CLARKSON, M.B.E. (1995). “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance”. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 92-117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
CRILLY, D., SCHNEIDER, S. C. and ZOLLO, M. (2008). “Psychological antecedents to socially responsible behavior”. European Management Review, 5, 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2008.15
CUTLIP, S. M. and ALLEN, H. C. (1971). Effective Publics Relations (4th ed). Englewood Cliffes: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
CUTLIP, S. M. and CENTER, A. H. (1952). Effective public relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
DE LAS HERAS-PEDROSA, C., RUIZ-MORA, I. and PANIAGUA ROJANO, F. J. (2018). Gestión de la Comunicación en Instituciones. Madrid: Pearson.
DONALDSON, T. and PRESTON, L. E. (1995). “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications”. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 65-91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
DREZNER, N. and HUEHLS, F. (2015). Fundraising and Institutional Advancement. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123850
EISENBERG, N. and MUSSEN, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
ESTENO, D., PETTY, R., RUCKER, D., WEGENER, D., BRAVERMAN, J. and DEVINE, P. (2004). “Discrete Emotions and Persuasion: The Role of Emotion-Induced Expectancies”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.43
ETZIONI, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
FERGUSON, M. A., WEIGOLD M. F. and GIBBS, J. D. (1984). The Relationship of Public Relations and Board-Level Boundary-Spanning Roles to Corporate Social Responsibility. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (67th, Gainesville, FL, August 5-8). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED245268.pdf [Consulted on 20 April 2022].
GRUNIG, J. E. (1976). “Organizations and public relations: Testing a communication theory”. Journalism Monographs, 46.
GRUNIG, J. E. (1989). “Symmetrical presuppositions as a framework for public relations theory”. In: C. H. BOTAN and J. HAZLETON (eds.). Public relations theory. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
GRUNIG, J. E. y HUNT, T. (2003). Dirección de Relaciones Públicas. Barcelona: Planeta.
GRUNIG, J. E. and REPPER, F. C. (1992). “Strategic Management, Publics and Issues”. In: GRUNIG, J. E. (Ed.). Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
HALLAHAN, K. (2000). “Inactive publics: The forgotten publics in public relations”. Public Relations Review, 26 (4), 499-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00061-8
HYMAN, H. H. and SHEATSLEY, P. B. (1947). “Some Reasons Why Information Campaigns Fail”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 11, 412-423.
HON, L. C. and GRUNIG, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gainesville: Institute for Public Relations.
HOVLAND C. I., JANIS I. L., KELLEY H. H. (1953). Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
JANIS, I., FESHBACH, S. and HUNT, J. (1953). “Effects of fear-arousing communications”. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48 (1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060732
KATZ, D. and KAHN, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed). New York: John Wiley and sons.
KOCHAN, T. and RUBISTEIN, S. (2000). “Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: the Saturn Partnership”. Organization Science, 11 (4), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.1287/ORSC.11.4.367.14601
KELLY, K. S. (1995). Utilizing public relations theory to conceptualize and test models of fundraising. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 1 (72), 106-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200109
LEAKEY, R. and LEWIN, R. (1994). Nuestros orígenes. Barcelona: RBA.
L’ETANG, J. (2009). “Public Relations and Diplomacy in a Globalized World: An Issue of Public Communication”. American Behavioral Scientist, 53 (4), 607-626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209347633
L’ETANG, J. (2013). Public Relations in Britain: A History of Professional Practice in the 20th Century. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610812
LEDINGHAM, J. (2003). Explicating Relationship Management as a General Theory of Public Relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15 (2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1502_4
LUHMANN, N. (1998). Sistemas sociales: lineamientos para una teoría general (2nd edition). Barcelona: Anthropos.
MILLER, J. and SANFORD, F. (1955). “Toward a general theory for the behavioral sciences”. American Psychologist, 10 (9), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045498
MITCHELL, R. K., AGLE, B. R. and WOOD, D. J. (1997). “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder. Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts”. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
NELSON, H., CUTLIP, S. M. and CENTER, A. H. (1959). “Effective Public Relations”. Journal of Marketing, 23 (4), 473. https://doi.org/10.2307/1247431
OPDYCKE, L. M. and MILLER, R. K. (2009). “Removing the Spin: Toward a New Theory of Public Relations History”. Journalism and Communication Monographs, 11 (4), 280-362.
PAVLIK, J.V. (1987). Public Relations: What Research Tell Us. London: Sage [translated as La investigación en relaciones públicas. Barcelona: Gestión 2000. (1999)].
PEARSON, R. (1990). “Perspectives on public relations history”. Public Relations Review, 16 (3), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-8111(05)80067-0
PETTY, R. and BRIÑOL, P. (2014). Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 29 (1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.967183
PETTY, R. E. and CACIOPPO, J. T. (1986). “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion”. In: Communication and Persuasion. New York: Springer, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
PETTY, R. E. and WEGENER, D. T. (1999). “The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies”. In: S. CHAIKEN and Y. TROPE (Eds.). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: The Guilford Press, 37-72.
PETTY, R. E., WEGENER, D. T. and FABRIGAR, L. R. (1997). “Attitudes and attitude change”. Annual Review of Psychology, 48 (1), 609-647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.609
RAWLINS, B. L. (2006). Prioritizing Stakeholders for PR. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/4237201/Priorizing-Stakeholders-for-PR-Brad-LRawlins Consulted on 22 April 2022.
RUIZ-MORA, I., LUGO-OCANDO, J. and CASTILLO-ESPARCIA, A. (2016). “Reluctant to talk, reluctant to listen: Public relations professionals and their involvement in CSR programmes in Spain”. Public Relations Review, 3 (42), 402-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.008
TORRES-MANCERA, R. (2021). Relaciones públicas y comunicación para un fundraising sostenible. Perspectivas internacionales [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] Universidad de Málaga.
VAN RULER, B. and VERČIČ, D. (2004). Public Relations and Communication Management in Europe: A Nation-by-Nation Introduction to Public Relations Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197198
WILSON, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
WORCHEL, S., COOPER, J. and GOETHALS, G. R. (1988). Understanding social psychology (5th ed). Pacific Grove, Calif: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.
WHITE, J. (2008). “Psychology and public relations”. In: D. MOSS, D. VERČIČ and G. WARNABY (Eds.). Perspectives on Public Relations Research. London: Routledge, 161-172.
XIFRA, J. (2003). Teorías y estructura de las relaciones públicas. Madrid: McGraw Hill-Interamericana de España.
Published
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2023 Rocío Torres-Mancera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
